How to take action
Contact your local MP
The best way to advocate for the rights of asylum seekers is to contact your local MP and demand answers. Amnesty Australia have launched an excellent campaign with tips on contacting your MP and asking questions such as
– What will happen to children sent to Nauru – especially those with no one to look after them?
– How long will people languish on Nauru – given that we know long-term detention can cause severe psychological trauma?
– Will independent organisations be able to visit and monitor what is happening on the islands?
To find out how to contact your local member and to take action, please click here or here
Stay informed
Read our latest factsheet on offshore processing. Read our factsheet on the model of support required for community based asylum seekers. Read our latest mythbuster on people smuggling.
Read our response to the expert panel, including joint press release with Malcolm Fraser.
End Mandatory Detention – get kids out of detention
The findings by the exper panel in August 2012 have paved the way for offshore processing to countries such ad Nauru, PNG and possibly Malaysia. If you want to learn more about the problems in Malaysian detention, read our special Malaysia people swap Mythbuster.
“Children in detention exhibited symptoms including bed wetting, sleep walking and night terrors. At the severe end of the spectrum, some children became mute, refused to eat and drink, made suicide attempts and began to self-harm, such as by cutting themselves. Some children also were not meeting their developmental milestones” – A Last Resort?: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention (HREOC) 2004
Children in detention
Click here to read our updated children in detention fact sheet.
Click here to read our 29 June 2011 press release on children in detention. On the 29th of June the Government announced that will release 62% of children from detention by their June 30 deadline – leaving 329 children in detention. That’s 329 too many.
Click here to read Chillout’s latest report (June 2011) into conditions facing children in immigration detention on Christmas Island.
Click here to read the 2011 Child Rights NGO Report – Listen to Children
No one chooses to be an asylum seeker
For asylum seekers, leaving is a matter of life or death – not choice.
- “I cannot go home because of what happened to me. I have no family left. I have no male protection. My father was arrested and my brothers too. The government is after me and my family. They can kill me. I wish sometimes I was dead.” (Ethiopia)
- “I was severely prosecuted for the belief of Falun Gong. The police just arrested me, put me away, put me into the detention centre, several times. The longest period was two years in their forced labour camp.” (China)
It is not illegal to seek asylum
- Asylum seekers are neither ‘illegal’ nor are they immigrants. Immigrants leave by choice and can return at any time. Asylum seekers are forced to leave and cannot return for fear of persecution – such as torture, imprisonment and execution.
- As a signatory to the UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Australia must provide protection to people fleeing persecution, regardless of whether they arrive by air or by sea.
- For the small number of asylum seekers that make it to this part of the world, Australia and New Zealand are the only possible destinations. They are the only two countries in the region that are signatories to the UN Refugee Convention, have a strong human rights record and have the resources to host asylum seekers.
- The detention of children should be used only as a last resort and for the shortest period of time as enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Detaining already vulnerable children has been shown to have catastrophic consequences on their development. Therefore there is a need to incorporate into the Migration Act the rights of children that Australia already recognises through being a signatory to the CRC.
- Currently, the Minister for Immigration is the legal guardian of all unaccompanied minors seeking asylum, which creates a clear conflict of interest seeing that the Minister represents at the same time the detaining authority and the visa decision-maker. The current situation needs to be changed so that the unaccompanied minors seeking asylum could have a legal guardian whose primary consideration is the best interests of the minors. An independent Commissioner for Children and Young People could fulfill this role.